Anticipating future water scarcity from climate change

By Richard Dallison

Water service providers in the UK face a vast array of challenges when it comes to planning their future operations and services; climate change impacts on the amount of water available for supply to consumers is key among these. In the future we are likely to see longer more accentuated seasons, this is particularly true for winter and summer, which are likely to become more cold and wet, and more hot and dry respectively.

This change in the timing and quantity of surface water available for abstraction by water companies for supply to consumers could lead to water scarcity problems unless steps are taken now to look at the scale and precise nature of these changes and to plan the necessary management to protect against these changes. For example, lower amounts of summer rainfall are likely to be compensated for by larger amounts of precipitation in the winter. However, if reservoirs already fill to capacity in the winter, and no new storage is developed, then this additional winter rainfall cannot be taken advantage of to help with the dryer summers. This is particularly true for Wales, as the vast majority (~97%) of water abstracted for supply to consumers is taken from surface water sources, in particular from upland impoundment reservoirs.

WP7_SWAT.jpg

 By using hydrological models, such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), we can look at how projected future climate changes will impact on surface waters. In particular in our work we have taken a worst case scenario approach in terms of future emissions, with representative concentration pathway 8.5 being considered – the IPCC scenario with the highest level of future greenhouse gas emissions. SWAT is a highly detailed hydrological model, which allows investigation of not only the changes in the quantity and timing of water supply, but also the quality of that water. To this end, we can investigate how pollutants such as nitrogen, phosphorous, and suspended sediments will alter under climate change. Alterations in water quality could impact heavily on water companies, as more polluted water may require more rigorous treatment at drinking water treatment plants. These increases in required treatment to maintain drinking water quality standards could have impacts on the operational efficiency of the plants, both financially and in terms of energy use. In certain cases, it may even be required to upgrade plants with new technologies and treatment methods in order to cope with such changes.

Warming trend in average autumn temperatures displayed five catchments in Wales. Linear trend line for the Dyfi catchment shown in red to exemplify the linear trend in all catchments

Warming trend in average autumn temperatures displayed five catchments in Wales. Linear trend line for the Dyfi catchment shown in red to exemplify the linear trend in all catchments

Furthermore, if we also look at how demand for water is influenced by weather conditions, we can see a strong positive correlation between total water use (domestic, agricultural and industrial) and average daily temperature. When it is considered that future summers are likely to become warmer and dryer, this relationship is likely to put increased pressure on a supply-demand balance that may already be water scarce due to reduced summer rainfall. We can already see the effect of the aforementioned prolonged seasons, with summer temperatures stretching further into the autumn over the past 30 years; the below figure shows the increase in annual autumn temperatures between 1982 and 2015 for the five catchments in Wales. This figure demonstrates the further the need for thorough water resource management planning in order to ensure the continued supply of clean drinking water into the future.

Festive wishes from Dŵr Uisce

Thank you for collaborating with the Dŵr Uisce cluster during 2019. Together, we have innovated! Looking forward to 2020, we will be running several workshops, events and initiatives in the New Year. Our next newsletter will be published in February. Merry Christmas!

Xmas greeting-01.jpg

Benchmarking energy and economic efficiency across water utilities

By Nathan Walker

Benchmarking is the practice of comparing processes via performance metrics against each other, in order to ascertain a best practice for that process for others to learn from. The process in question can almost be anything, from rollercoasters and snooker chalk (yes, really) to pumps and water companies. Due the nature of our project, water companies were the subject of benchmarking in this research. Despite the UK water sector being mature in benchmarking, we believed we could add extra value to the companies, as well as academia, by applying new methodologies to analyse the efficiency of their operations, along with factors that may influence those efficiencies.

Figure 1. A basic schematic of the operations that a water utility conducts.

Figure 1. A basic schematic of the operations that a water utility conducts.

Initially, the approach in benchmarking comprised of stand-alone indicators (e.g. volume of water produced). Then to encompass at least some fairer level of comparison, partial indicators became prominent such as volume of water produced/population served and spending/volume of water treated. In academia, benchmarking has largely branched in to techniques that are slightly more complex. We chose data envelopment analysis (DEA), a non-parametric frontier approach to analyse a sample of UK and Irish water and sewage companies, which has the advantage of integrating multiple input and output metrics, and giving a value for each company that is determined relative to others in the sample. Specifically, we utiltised a double-bootstrap version of DEA that allows statistical inferences and hypothesis testing, essentially meaning we could investigate how other indicators may influence the efficiency of a company’s core operation (inputting energy and money to produce clean drinking water and treat wastewater), whilst avoiding some statistical errors that occur with techniques that similar objectives.

Results from the research indicated that companies across the UK and Ireland could on average reduce their economic and energy inputs by 19% and 16%, whilst maintaining the same levels of water delivery and treatment outputs. Furthermore, we found that the method we used changed the rank of over 65% of the companies, compared to the standard DEA model, showing the importance of utilising the most appropriate approach design. Finally, research so far has highlighted external variables that influence efficiency. Population density and the percentage of water abstracted from surface water showed to have a significant positive impact on both economic and energy efficiency, whilst leakage and number of abstraction sources were concurrent in their significantly negative influence across both energy and economic performance. Moreover, average pumping head height and consumption per capita displayed a significant negative effect for energy, conversely the variable proportion of water passing through the largest 50% of treatment works was deemed to have a significant negative effect on economic efficiency. Recommendations from this area of the research so far include: reduction campaigns for consumers, leakage reduction, evaluating security of supply vs. efficiency for number of sources, assess the potential to reduce head heights within new and existing networks, and investigate the optimal size of treatment plant to utilise economies of scale.

Some of these results are quite rare, whilst some may seem more obvious, however giving evidence towards certain areas helps to inform decision-making and prioritisation. This is one of the key advantages that benchmarking can offer, along with identifying those who have best practice, the idea being that the benchmarking ultimately facilitates sharing of these best practices. To ensure benchmarking can facilitate companies to perform optimally, improvements in transparency and communication is still required, which in theory is one of the easier hurdles to leap since the water sector already collects and stores the crucial data.

Contributing to “Wells of Life Ireland”, protecting the first Welsh Bible and learning to innovate at the same time

Dr Katrin Dreyer-Gibney

Looking back on 2019, two events stood out within the Dwr Uisce Network. One was the official opening of the micro-hydropower turbine installation in the Blackstairs Group Water Scheme site, Co. Wexford, Ireland earlier this year. This low-cost installation reduces energy consumption from water treatment and distribution works by 20-25%.

 And there is more to it. Cost savings resulting from the hydropower installation are donated to the “Wells of Life Ireland” Charity. This Charity helps to provide clean water sources for people in Uganda who don’t have access to safe water. A second installation launch took place in November, in Ty Mawr, Snowdonia, Wales. This time the energy generated is set to protect 200 rare Bibles, including the first Welsh translation from the effects of climate change. Increased rainfall and damp are affecting the manuscripts. Now the plan is to use electricity generated from a stream nearby to control humidity levels.

Daniele Novara demonstrates micro-hydropower installation to water industry representatives in the Blackstairs Group Water Scheme

Daniele Novara demonstrates micro-hydropower installation to water industry representatives in the Blackstairs Group Water Scheme

 Ty Mawr is a 16th Century farmhouse. It was the birthplace of Bishop William Morgan, whose translation of the Bible into Welsh in 1588 has been described as the most significant step in ensuring the survival of the language today. Both events were primarily designed to officially launch and demonstrate the installation to national water treatment site managers, industry representatives, government officials and the press, so they could “spread the word”, see the benefits and perhaps be interested in installing and supporting the technology also.

 Besides the positive contributions these installations make to society, the official opening events provided learning opportunities also, for practitioners and researchers alike. Not only did they learn about new hydropower technology, but they learned to innovate also. Innovation has many different definitions. In the context of this innovation project, the one that fits best is developing solutions to existing problems. Learning to innovate means acquiring the capabilities to find solutions to existing problems, in this case finding solutions to address the problems of greenhouse gas emission and high water energy costs.

So, what exactly was learned?

Setting the Scene

First of all, the organisers of the events learned how best to create environment that facilitate learning to innovate, to put in place the logistics such as the support staff transport, catering, the timing of events, so that the learners could just focus on the learning, nothing else.

Facilitate Questioning

Both events were attended by water industry and government representatives, site managers and researchers from the fields of engineering, geology, environmental studies, and management. It had to be ensured that all were comfortable to ask  questions, both formally and informally. After the initial welcomes, presentations where held by both researchers and site managers, facilitating initial questions.

Then the demonstration site visits followed which in Ty Mawr included a hike up to the water source and a tour of the farmhouse, holding the bibles. The attendees were subdivided into smaller groups, so they could ask plenty of questions about the installations, how they worked and assess how the technology could work in other places. Back at the event location lunches were providing, offering more opportunities for asking questions, discussing installation opportunities and networking. Throughout the event it was emphasised that both researchers and practitioners are learners and teachers.

More Questions, more answers…

More Questions, more answers…

 Learning about Barriers and Enablers to Innovation

Deriving from all the questions asked the participants learned about the barriers and enablers to innovate. The barriers were, for example, the volume of data required to assess the feasibility to install the turbine, and the variation in their local environments. However, there were many enablers also, for example, the belief amongst all that this was the right thing to do and the availability of research funding.

 Overall, site managers, water industry representatives and other practitioners learned about energy recovery possibilities in their own operation facilities. The researchers learned how to diffuse their new inventions.

 Both practitioners and researchers learned how to manage demonstration events and promote continuous innovation, a capability that is vital to address sustainability issues in the 21st century.



Collaboration with South Caernarfon Creameries in Wales

Annum and Isabel visited South Caernarfon Creameries in Wales on the 26th November to discuss opportunities for water and energy savings at their plant. The creamery who is led by a farmer cooperative converts about 400,000 liter per day into cheese and delivers to major supermarket chains throughout the UK. Iestyn O’Neill, head of engineering, gave them a tour around the whole site, from the milk silos to pasteurisation, cheese making and packaging. As hygiene standards for a creamery require frequent cleaning with hot water, there seems to be plenty of potential for heat recovery from drain water and we are delighted to work together with SCC and support them on their way of becoming even more water and energy efficient. Thanks for the very insightful tour and also for the cheese treats J Looking forward to our collaboration!

Annum (2nd from left) and Isabel (3rd from left) meeting Iestyn O’Neill at South Caernarfon Creameries for collaboration on efficient water use

Annum (2nd from left) and Isabel (3rd from left) meeting Iestyn O’Neill at South Caernarfon Creameries for collaboration on efficient water use

Reducing energy cost and greenhouse gas emissions by households in Wales

by Annum Rafique

There are approximately 27.6 million dwellings in the UK, which includes houses, flats, mansions, bungalows and park homes. Each year less than 160,000 new homes are being built in the UK. The existing homes undergo renovation over time but the speed of improvement is slow.

These dwelling thereafter referred to as households, consume one-third of the total energy produced in the UK. The main uses of energy in the household are for space and water heating. The energy consumption in households contributes more than a quarter to the total UK Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions.

Approximately 75% of the houses in Wales are built before the 1980s due to which Wales has a higher proportion of solid-wall homes and properties off the gas grid. Solid-wall homes are more expensive to insulate. Therefore, the Welsh homes would need individual low-carbon heating solutions, which may cost more per household than the larger decarbonisation of the gas grid.

One of the greatest challenges that water sector faces is the cost effectiveness of decarbonising the sector. The reluctance of households and industry to adopt low or zero-carbon technologies (LZC) usually stems from the additional cost associated with introducing these measures.

The carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from housing have fallen more than one-fifths from the 1990s despite an increase in the number of homes. The likely reason for the reduction in emissions is due to an increase in building efficiency and lower emissions from switching to an alternative heating source. If the UK wants to become a zero net carbon economy by 2030, it needs to reduce the energy consumption in households.

A study is being conducted to estimate the marginal abatement cost curve (MACC) for water-related energy efficiency measures. The MACC approach is a framework used to identify cost effective low-carbon technologies available for domestic use and determine which mitigation methods are the most cost effective in saving energy as well as in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions.

What is Marginal Abatement Cost Curves (MACC)?

Figure 1 MACC analysis

Figure 1 MACC analysis

The MACC is a tool that aid in decision making by identifying the projects that are the most cost effective per unit of CO2 equivalents abated. It also identifies which project or intervention offers the greatest abatement potential.

The MACC provides a visual representation of a group of abetment projects listed down from the most cost effective per tonne of CO2 abatement to the least cost effective option. Figure 1 shows how MACC are represented.

On the vertical axis is the cost per tonne of CO2 abated and on the horizontal axis is the potential CO2 saving in tonnes per year. The MACC provides a visual representation of a group of abetment projects listed down from the most cost effective per tonne of CO2 abatement to the least cost effective option.

MACC allows us to asses all the expected potential costs associated with the low carbon technology such as operating, maintenance and other costs through the lifetime of the technology.

MACC of photovoltaics (PV) systems in households

Figure 2 MACC analysis for small houses

Figure 2 MACC analysis for small houses

The abatement potential of replacing different kind of boilers with photovoltaics (PV) is measured.

The data for the energy use of households was taken for Gwynedd, Wales from the EPC website. The data consisted of 1,399 houses over 10 years from 2008 to 2018. The houses were of various sizes however, they all use used electricity for water and space heating. While developing MACC, variations in house sizes, types and fuel use was considered.

Energy consumption increases with the size of houses. Furthermore, detached and end-terrace houses consume 30% more energy as compared to semi-detached or mid-terrace houses of similar size.

The fixed installation cost of the PV system is £1,500 with variable costs ranging from £5,320 to £8,512, depending on the size of the system.

Figure 2 shows the MACC for small houses of size between 1 to 55m2. By the uptake of PV system for space and water heating, these houses would be reducing their energy costs by up to 50%. Moreover, the installation of PV would result in an overall savings of £800 to £22,000 per tonne of CO2 abatement. Furthermore implementing PV system in 243 houses of smaller size would save up to 370 tonnes of CO2 every year. These houses, on an average, would be reducing their energy costs by more than a half.

Similar MACCs were created for houses of various sizes and implementing PV systems in all 1,399 houses in Gwynedd would save up to 2,759 tonnes of CO2 each year. Furthermore, it would result in households reducing their energy costs by up to 70%.

However, PV systems are not the only LZC available to consumers. A detailed analysis of other LZC would be conducted to provide complete information to the consumers so that they can make an informed decision.

Updates on Tŷ Mawr small-scale hydropower demonstration site

Energy generation during November 2019 = 1,605.3 kWh of active power (+220% with respect to October). On 20/11/2019 the power curve of the inverter controller was substantially modified, and a few minor sensor flaws were addressed which resulted into trends well observable in the following charts.

Translating and communicating research into actionable knowledge/practices

by Szu-Hsin Wu, Paul Coughlan

Dŵr Uisce is an interdisciplinary project which was preceded by the earlier Hydro BPT project. To date, Dŵr Uisce has implemented energy recovery solutions developed from conceptualisation and laboratory tests to full-scale installations at four demonstration sites: Blackstairs Group Water Scheme (Ireland), ABP Foods (Ireland), Tŷ Mawr Wybrnant (Wales) and Penrhyn Castle (Wales). Dŵr Uisce is also expanding the research scope in new directions such as hydropower in deep mines, environmental impact assessment and citizen science. The overarching goal is to achieve green innovation.

Dŵr Uisce is focused on green innovation and actively considers commercial potential and the environmental and ecological impact. Developing a viable and environmentally sustainable response to customers’ demands is a critical challenge. So, in designing the response it is necessary to accommodate the user expectations, climate trends and environmental regulations. Without understanding the perspectives of the various stakeholders, implementation of green innovation is difficult especially where it requires the support of industries, local communities and authorities. However, through our communications, knowledge exchanges and stakeholder engagements, we have heightened public awareness of water-related issues caused by climate change and engaged industries and local communities and authorities in collaboration.

The Dŵr Uisce researchers are disseminating our findings in three main formats: 1) publishing scientific studies; 2) organising workshops and demonstrating new technology; and 3) online and print media exposure. The researchers are presenting new findings at international conferences across Europe where stakeholders from academia and industry are engaging with the ideas. Both academics and practitioners participate in our annual conferences where conceptual knowledge and insights are translated and exchanged through face-to-face communication. Now, we are aiming to engage an even broader audience in discussion and collaboration on water-related issues. Further development of online platforms and social media provides us with enhanced opportunities to translate and communicate our research ideas into actionable knowledge for end-users, the wider public and the research community.

To engage with these wider audiences, we are translating our scientific findings into plain language, which is not always easy. Such translation needs to be based on an understanding of the audience background and expertise. Based on the understanding, we make conceptual knowledge accessible by writing in simple and engaging manner, describing the challenges and solutions in different ways, and using images and practical demonstrations. The result is that the audience develops a better understanding of the challenge, research response and the action possibilities. For example, in preparing our website updates, the Dŵr Uisce researchers invite lay audience representatives to read and comment before we publish online. The feedback and comments help the researchers to clarify and deliver a focused message. This acts as an internal peer-review process. We use images and other multimedia to create a closer connection between science and our audiences. On twitter, we share water distribution and energy recovery related information and build a more personal connection with our audience by using simple language and keeping them in the loop of every research step. The result is that the public is not only well informed by the latest updates but also appreciates the relevance of this green innovation initiative to daily life. Taking it further, the Dŵr Uisce project is giving back to the global community. The full-scale demonstration plant at Blackstairs Group Water Scheme was installed in February 2019 and the energy savings achieved are being donated to the water charity Wells for Life. Our hope is that, through translating and sharing our conceptual knowledge, it can continue to be transformed into actionable knowledge and maybe even behavioural changes: our innovative ideas can be seen, heard and even be acted upon.

To date, our research has been accepted for publications in high-quality journals. We have collaborated with over 70 organisations and companies on the efficiency of water consumption and energy recovery. We have more than six hundred twitter followers and many regular website visitors from around the world. However, communication, knowledge exchange and collaboration will continue as we work and research to achieve our goal. We are planning new workshops targeting school children, young researchers and practitioners in water-intensive sectors. In many ways, they are the future leaders who will continue to achieve green innovation. Dŵr Uisce has taken this green initiative as part of our responsibility to society as we turn it into a social innovation which co-creates value with and for the society.

New findings presented at the British Hydropower Association annual conference

By Daniele Novara

On November 13-14th the 2019 British Hydropower Association annual conference took place at the Hilton Grosvenor Hotel in Glasgow. The speaker’s line-up included more than 30 figures representing academia, industry and water/energy authorities.


Among the presenters was Daniele Novara from Trinity College Dublin, who introduced the audience to the two hydro pilot plants recently built by the Dŵr Uisce project in Ireland and Wales. Such installations are both powered by a 4 kW Pump As Turbine (PAT) which showed many advantages over conventional turbines – essentially reduced purchase cost and simplified maintenance. Besides, such devices can be effectively placed along with pre-existent pipe networks thus dramatically lowering the resources and time needed to complete the installation.


The performances of the two operating turbines will be monitored on the long period to gather additional information on their durability and efficacy when deployed on the field.

First returns from the heat recovery demonstration site at ABP Cahir

By Jan Spriet

The demonstrator at the ABP meat processing plant in Cahir, co. Tipperary, Ireland aims at showing and studying the potential heat recovery from highly loaded wastewater. This wastewater is available in large volumes at the factory’s own wastewater treatment plant. In the case of this demonstration rig, part of the wastewater is pumped through the heat recovery system.

The heat recovered through through 1 single (of 6) heat exchanger stands at 30kWh after one night. The total direct heat recovery system (all 7 pipes), would thus reduce the Carbon emissions by almost 36 kg Carbon equivalent per operating night.

The wastewater source heat pump produced around 65 kWh, with a COP of 3.25, on this operating night, delivering water with a flow rate of 2 l/min at 45°C, during the whole night (15 hours).

Additional tweaking of the settings will continue over the following weeks, before the system will be commissioned in its final form early 2020.